Garry Kasparov and management in the age of human-machine teams

Everyone knows the story: in 1997, world chess champion Garry Kasparov lost to the computer Deep Blue. For many, this moment crystallized our fears about a world where machines triumph over humans. But what happened next tells a more hopeful story—one that's incredibly relevant to how we lead teams today.

Rather than fighting against machines, Kasparov did something unexpected. He changed the game entirely, creating "Advanced Chess," where humans and computers collaborate as true partners.

The results were remarkable. It wasn't the world's best grandmasters or the most powerful computers that dominated this new format. Instead, teams of amateur players paired with AI—but with well-designed collaboration processes—consistently outperformed everyone else.

As Kasparov puts it: "A weak human + a machine + a good process beats a strong human + a machine + a bad process."

We have this quote displayed in our office because it captures something essential about our moment in history. In the age of generative AI, individual brilliance matters less than the ability to orchestrate collective intelligence.

‍

A new kind of leadership

Being a manager today requires us to think differently about our role. We're no longer just leading a team of people—we're orchestrating a constellation of human collaborators and intelligent agents, each with unique strengths and capabilities.

This shift isn't just about adding new tools to our toolkit. It's about developing an entirely new mindset. Here are three approaches we've found essential for leading in this hybrid world:

1. Become an architect of possibility

Instead of asking "Can AI replace this job?" try asking "How can we break this work into its component parts?" When you map out specific tasks, you can start to see where different capabilities shine:

• Which tasks are repetitive and rule-based? (Perfect for AI)
• Which require empathy, cultural understanding, or ethical judgment? (Distinctly human)
• Which could be enhanced through augmentation rather than automation? (The sweet spot for collaboration)

This isn't about efficiency for its own sake. It's about freeing people to focus on the work that energizes them—strategy, creativity, relationship-building, and problem-solving that requires genuine human insight.

We've seen this approach transform teams. Instead of fearing displacement, people discover new ways to apply their uniquely human capabilities while AI handles the routine work that often drains their energy.

2. Trust as the foundation

Introducing AI into a team isn't just a technical challenge—it's fundamentally about relationships and trust. People need to understand not just what AI can do, but what it can't do, and how they fit into the bigger picture.

Your role as a leader is to create psychological safety around this transition:

• Be transparent about how AI works and where its limitations lie
• Establish clear boundaries about who's responsible for what, and when
• Create regular touchpoints where humans can provide feedback and course-correct

When people understand the rules of engagement, they're more likely to experiment, learn from mistakes, and gradually build confidence in working with AI as a tool that amplifies rather than threatens their contributions.

3. Coach the whole team: human and AI

Perhaps the most fascinating part of leading hybrid teams is that you're essentially coaching two different types of intelligence to work together effectively.

For your human team members, this means helping them develop new skills: learning to ask better questions of AI systems, critically evaluating AI-generated outputs, and understanding how to provide feedback that improves AI performance.

For the AI systems, it means "training" them through careful data curation, precise feedback, and well-designed use cases that align with your team's goals and values.

The magic happens when both sides of this equation improve together. You're not seeking individual perfection from either humans or machines, but rather collective performance that exceeds what either could achieve alone.

‍

The art of orchestration

The leader in this new world isn't the person who has all the answers or makes all the decisions. Instead, they're the conductor who designs the right interactions, sets the tempo, and protects the space where collective intelligence can emerge.

This requires humility—acknowledging that the best solutions often come from unexpected combinations of human insight and machine capability. It also requires curiosity—staying open to new ways of working that may challenge our assumptions about how things should be done.

At Spentia, we've come to believe that orchestration is perhaps the most important leadership skill for the years ahead. The leaders who master it won't just create more efficient teams—they'll build organizations where both people and technology can contribute their best, creating value that's both meaningful and sustainable.

The future isn't about choosing between human intelligence and artificial intelligence. It's about the wisdom to bring them together in service of something larger than either could achieve alone.

For more insights on human-AI collaboration in leadership, we recommend this Harvard Business Review piece: AI Should Augment Human Intelligence, Not Replace It