Sales performance: free up time to sell

Sales performance: free up time to sell

Targets, training, coaching and incentives can improve sales performance. Their effect depends partly on whether sellers have time to use their skills. Start by understanding where that time goes.

Targets, training, coaching and incentives can improve sales performance. Their effect depends partly on whether sellers have time to use their skills. Start by understanding where that time goes.

Targets, training, coaching and incentives can improve sales performance. Their effect depends partly on whether sellers have time to use their skills. Start by understanding where that time goes.

Pencil drawing: four people standing in discussion, crossed by a vertical line dotted with orange points.
Pencil drawing: four people standing in discussion, crossed by a vertical line dotted with orange points.
Pencil drawing: four people standing in discussion, crossed by a vertical line dotted with orange points.
Published
Updated
Share this guideBy emailLinkedIn

What sales performance measures

Sales performance concerns the ability to turn effort into profitable, collected revenue. Effectiveness means directing effort towards the right customers and actions. Productivity concerns the result obtained from the resources used. Both depend on the wider organisation.

Revenue, conversion and cycle time measure results. Recruitment, training and incentives influence people. A complete assessment also examines how much time is available for selling.

Two factors to consider together

Available selling time and the value produced during that time are connected. Salesforce’s 2022–2023 findings reported that respondents spent 28% of their week selling. This historical survey result provides a reason to investigate your own team’s time, not a substitute for measuring it.

Training may improve the quality of a conversation. Removing unnecessary administration may create more time for those conversations. Compare the expected value and effort of both approaches using evidence from the business.

Where selling time goes

Common sources of workload include repeated data entry, requalification of leads, internal approvals and searches for the right information. Our article selling time lost to data entry describes one example.

Trace the source of each activity across the process. A more demanding target cannot, by itself, remove a broken handover or missing information. A lead-to-cash assessment helps identify who can change it.

Measure workload alongside outcomes

Add a small set of operational measures to the sales dashboard: selling time, corrections per case, preparation versus waiting time for quotations, internal contacts per opportunity and response time for incoming enquiries.

These measures can show rising effort before it becomes obvious in revenue or conversion. The article hidden costs in sales explains how teams can absorb problems while output indicators remain stable.

Organisation and assessments

Make organisational decisions with a clear assessment

Our assessments identify practical changes to help your teams and processes work together.

Sequence the improvements

First, recover useful capacity. Address the most costly problems: duplicate entry, inconsistent qualification or approval steps that no longer serve a clear purpose.

Then decide how to use that capacity. More customer meetings, better preparation of strategic opportunities or renewed attention to neglected accounts require an explicit plan. Check that the time is actually redirected.

Improve the value of selling time. Use training linked to real opportunities, coaching grounded in observed work and incentives consistent with commercial and financial objectives. These activities may run alongside process changes; the point is to address both constraints.

Consider the employee experience

Repeated internal chasing and administrative rework can affect job satisfaction. Reducing those demands may improve the working experience as well as capacity. Treat any effect on retention as something to measure, not an automatic saving.

Review progress regularly

A short weekly review can compare a few workload measures with a few outcome measures, then assign a concrete action. Track whether changes actually reduce work and improve delivery.

As a starting exercise, ask several salespeople to reconstruct a typical week. Use their accounts to identify questions for a broader time-use assessment.

Our industrial equipment example turns findings into workstreams, resources and estimated gains. Explore the example lead-to-cash action plan. It is a composite case based on engagements; the gains shown are estimates.

Further reading

Frequently asked questions

How can we improve sales performance?

How can we improve sales performance?

Identify constraints on selling time, address the most costly ones and decide how to use the capacity released. Combine that work with relevant training, coaching and incentives. Measure the effect on both workload and business results.

Which sales performance indicators should we track?

Which sales performance indicators should we track?

Combine outcomes such as revenue, conversion, average order value and cycle time with workload measures such as selling time, rework, quotation waiting time and first-response time. Choose a small set linked to decisions you can make.

How does sales effectiveness differ from sales performance?

How does sales effectiveness differ from sales performance?

Effectiveness concerns choosing the right targets and actions. Productivity concerns output per unit of resource. Sales performance brings them together with profitability and payment collection.

Does training improve sales performance?

Does training improve sales performance?

It can, especially when tied to actual tasks and opportunities. Check whether sellers also have the time, information and support needed to apply what they learn. Training and process improvement address different constraints.

Sources

  • Salesforce, State of Sales, fifth-edition findings, 2022–2023. Salesforce summary.

  • Savall H., Zardet V., Maîtriser les coûts et les performances cachés, Economica. ISEOR.

What sets us apart.

Five commitments, from listening to an action plan.

1. Every team invited over three days.

Aria invites everyone within scope to an individual, anonymous interview. Interviews take place over three days. Participation has exceeded 85% on every engagement.

1. Every team invited over three days.

Aria invites everyone within scope to an individual, anonymous interview. Interviews take place over three days. Participation has exceeded 85% on every engagement.

2. Analysis led by senior consultants.

2. Analysis led by senior consultants.

Our consultants use B-ADSc to link bottlenecks to the decisions, responsibilities and information that cause them. You know where to act and why.

3. Control over your technology and data.

3. Control over your technology and data.

Data hosted in France. Strict compliance with the EU AI Act and GDPR.

4. An action plan in four weeks.

4. An action plan in four weeks.

The engagement takes four weeks, from scoping to final presentation. You receive costed actions, ranked with you and set out in a clear schedule.

5. Conclusions linked to the facts.

5. Conclusions linked to the facts.

Each conclusion links to the accounts that support it. We compare responses across functions and state the assumptions behind our calculations.

What sets us apart.

Five commitments, from listening to an action plan.

1. Every team invited over three days.

Aria invites everyone within scope to an individual, anonymous interview. Interviews take place over three days. Participation has exceeded 85% on every engagement.

1. Every team invited over three days.

Aria invites everyone within scope to an individual, anonymous interview. Interviews take place over three days. Participation has exceeded 85% on every engagement.

2. Analysis led by senior consultants.

2. Analysis led by senior consultants.

Our consultants use B-ADSc to link bottlenecks to the decisions, responsibilities and information that cause them. You know where to act and why.

3. Control over your technology and data.

3. Control over your technology and data.

Data hosted in France. Strict compliance with the EU AI Act and GDPR.

4. An action plan in four weeks.

4. An action plan in four weeks.

The engagement takes four weeks, from scoping to final presentation. You receive costed actions, ranked with you and set out in a clear schedule.

5. Conclusions linked to the facts.

5. Conclusions linked to the facts.

Each conclusion links to the accounts that support it. We compare responses across functions and state the assumptions behind our calculations.

What sets us apart.

Five commitments, from listening to an action plan.

1. Every team invited over three days.

Aria invites everyone within scope to an individual, anonymous interview. Interviews take place over three days. Participation has exceeded 85% on every engagement.

1. Every team invited over three days.

Aria invites everyone within scope to an individual, anonymous interview. Interviews take place over three days. Participation has exceeded 85% on every engagement.

2. Analysis led by senior consultants.

2. Analysis led by senior consultants.

Our consultants use B-ADSc to link bottlenecks to the decisions, responsibilities and information that cause them. You know where to act and why.

3. Control over your technology and data.

3. Control over your technology and data.

Data hosted in France. Strict compliance with the EU AI Act and GDPR.

4. An action plan in four weeks.

4. An action plan in four weeks.

The engagement takes four weeks, from scoping to final presentation. You receive costed actions, ranked with you and set out in a clear schedule.

5. Conclusions linked to the facts.

5. Conclusions linked to the facts.

Each conclusion links to the accounts that support it. We compare responses across functions and state the assumptions behind our calculations.

ARTICLE

What the teams already knew.

From engagement survey to decisions that change work. An engagement survey flags a difficulty. It does not say what to change. At a pharmaceutical company, around a hundred patient advisors made this journey in five months: confidential interviews, a questionnaire built on what they had said, workshops with their managers, then two decisions explained and put to the test. The case, published by Harvard Business Review, shows what separates a score from a decision, and the role an HR department can play in it.

Pencil drawing: nine people stand talking beneath a vertical orange line marked with dots, from which fine lines branch out.
Pencil portrait of a man with a shaved head, looking upwards, crossed by orange lines and dots.

ARTICLE

What the teams already knew.

From engagement survey to decisions that change work. An engagement survey flags a difficulty. It does not say what to change. At a pharmaceutical company, around a hundred patient advisors made this journey in five months: confidential interviews, a questionnaire built on what they had said, workshops with their managers, then two decisions explained and put to the test. The case, published by Harvard Business Review, shows what separates a score from a decision, and the role an HR department can play in it.

Pencil drawing: nine people stand talking beneath a vertical orange line marked with dots, from which fine lines branch out.
Pencil portrait of a man with a shaved head, looking upwards, crossed by orange lines and dots.

ARTICLE

What the teams already knew.

From engagement survey to decisions that change work. An engagement survey flags a difficulty. It does not say what to change. At a pharmaceutical company, around a hundred patient advisors made this journey in five months: confidential interviews, a questionnaire built on what they had said, workshops with their managers, then two decisions explained and put to the test. The case, published by Harvard Business Review, shows what separates a score from a decision, and the role an HR department can play in it.

Pencil drawing: nine people stand talking beneath a vertical orange line marked with dots, from which fine lines branch out.

Subscribe to the Spentia newsletter

Subscribe to the Spentia newsletter

Every Monday: three sourced facts, an article and a podcast.

AI, organisation and management: understand the changes and their effects on your business.

Every Monday: three sourced facts, an article and a podcast.

AI, organisation and management: understand the changes and their effects on your business.

Our newsletter is in French. You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in each issue.

Our newsletter is in French. You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in each issue.

Spentia SAS - 1 rue de Stockholm, FR-75008 Paris

Spentia SAS - 1 rue de Stockholm, FR-75008 Paris